Quality of candidates
2020-07-23
Document History
Original Publish Date: 23 July, 2020
Updated on: 28 April, 2021
In this post, we are trying to assess nature of candidates in dynast constituency and how it differs from a non-dynast constituency. In the analysis we exclude of the winner since our intention is to asses how having important dynast candidate affect the general candidate characteristics in that particular constituency.
UP
AE 2012 & 2017
Assets
Constituency type : 1 - Dynast constituency, 2- Non-dynast constituency
| Dynast constituency | Total assets | Total movable assets | Total immovable assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| FALSE | 11201272 | 3022423 | 7698183 |
| TRUE | 12949288 | 3037887 | 9589640 |
Criminality
| Dynast constituency | Serious crime | Non-serious crime |
|---|---|---|
| FALSE | 0.28 | 0.49 |
| TRUE | 0.28 | 0.43 |
Profession
Education
| Constituency type | Education | Proportion |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | School | 0.44 |
| 1 | School | 0.45 |
| 0 | UG | 0.38 |
| 1 | UG | 0.38 |
| 0 | PG+ | 0.18 |
| 1 | PG+ | 0.17 |
UP GE 2009:2019
Assets
| Dynast constituency | Total assets | Total movable assets | Total immovable assets |
|---|---|---|---|
| FALSE | 33181408 | 10063275 | 21735204 |
| TRUE | 31460799 | 7713126 | 22843192 |
Criminality
| Dynast constituency | Serious crime | Non-serious crime |
|---|---|---|
| FALSE | 0.46 | 0.74 |
| TRUE | 0.46 | 0.70 |
–>
–>
–>
–>
–> –> –> –> –>
–>
–>